DIGITAL ID, DATA &  PRIVACY

Now it would seem the UN is accelerating the process to achieve this SDG by 2025 as detailed in their report; Digital Strategy 2022 - 2025.

In June 2020 Klaus Schwab wrote a book called; Covid-19: The Great Reset and one of his sibylline insights, was that: the containment of the coronavirus pandemic will necessitate a global surveillance network capable of identifying new outbreaks as soon as they arrive.

The WEF have written extensively on the matter in recent years and their, 2022 Advancing Digital Agency: The Power of Data Intermediaries, the WEF notes that vaccine passports, mandated across the world during the COVID-19 pandemic, do; by nature, serve as a form of digital identity.  They also write in an approving manner on questionable activity like how vaccine passports have allowed governments to harvest data from citizens without; notice or consent.  

Additionally, the WEF details how biometric digital IDs could be used to decide whether people should be granted access to services, like applying for a bank loan, by judging their digital profile, which may include their credit, medical, and online purchasing history, among other things.  It gives us a very clear indication of exactly what direction these, unelected organisations, see the evolution of digital ID heading, and is it is a slippery slope towards a system of; algorithm based decision-making, where; in their own words:

A trusted digital assistant, would automate our permission to share our data which would; overcome the limitations of notice and consent.

They are calling for digital identity programs to be installed all around the world claiming it will create a digital economy worth trillions of dollars of opportunities; but for whom?

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are also heavily involved.  The World Banks; Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative, again guided by UN Agenda 2030, released their paper in 2021 entitled; Principles on Identification for Sustainable Development: Towards the Digital Age.  This report makes their intentions very clear, while creating a $1 billion fund intended to finance investments in; strengthening the fight against pandemics in areas including; disease surveillance.
 
ID2020, which is an alliance of governments, non-profits, academia and over 150 private sector companies including the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI), Microsoft, The Rockefeller Foundation, who are all founding partners, MasterCard and 11 UN agencies who are also currently collaborating on how to provide a unique digital identity to everyone on the planet. 
 
The ID2020 Alliance has already launched a digital identity program in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh and GAVI, with the specific intention of leveraging vaccination as an opportunity to establish digital identity.
 
And, in full compliance with the UN Agenda, the British Governments plans to introduce a digital ID are already well underway.  The; strangely underreported, and confusing online consultation began in January 2023  and was set to run until the end of March 2023.  They originally predicted a provisional timetable which indicated the enactment of powers in October 2023 with all the data sharing mechanisms in place by December 2023. However; to date the public are not buying into it, and we must continue to resist, especially now as the prospect of the "BritCard" begins to rear its authoritarian head.
 
In practice what it would permit, is every British citizen's data being collected, collated, and made readily available to anyone the Government deems suitable.  In the online consultation document, we find the extremely vague listing: Transactional data; which will be included in the data collated and processed.  
 
Transactional data is the information generated whenever a transaction takes place.  This could be a financial transaction, such as a purchase or sale, bank deposits or withdrawals, insurance quotes and claims data, work based transactional data can include the tracking of an employees working hours or even an e-mail exchange between two people.  
 
A huge concern is our data and privacy.  What third parties would have access to our information, without any need for our; notice or consent?  Again, in the online consultation we find the answer, tucked away in Annex 4:  Every Government department, including the Ministry of Defence, and sandwiched in the middle we find a listing equally as vague as; transactional data, here we find the listing: 
 
An organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective.  
 
This would see our data potentially available to any corporation which provides services to any Government department.  At the moment this would include organisations like; Amazon, Microsoft, the nefarious organisation now at the heart of NHSX; Palantir, and of course the WEF, who have been collaborating with the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy since 2019.

This level of assault of our individual right to privacy and the right to control our own data is unprecedented and it cannot be allowed to simply drift into legislation without a national debate and referendum.
 
Biometric Digital I.D. is at the heart of this fraudulent enterprise.  They need to know who we are and what we are doing in order to facilitate the rest of their agenda.  It is integral; it is the first step, and we must collectively resist their implementation with every fibre of our being.  The second step is climate control.