CLIMATE CHANGE & HUMAN CO2
The ‘Human CO2’ propaganda is such a powerful and well coordinated campaign, it is difficult to ignore, and even more difficult to break down.
It is the most sinister sort of propaganda because; at its core, it is designed to emotionally manipulate people into a course of action, driven by a sense of personal guilt.
Research indicates that nearly half of young people report feeling distressed or anxious about climate change in a way that affects their daily lives.
It is nothing short of child cruelty.​

​There are very serious environmental issues that require urgent attention: habitat destruction, the pollution of our rivers and seas, animal cruelty and a corporate intensive farming model which should be regarded as criminal. However; these very serious issues are being conflated with Human CO2 emissions and used to power the; Climate Change war cry, that drives the emotion behind this entire fraudulent agenda.
The level of CO2 in the atmosphere is approximately 0.04% of the total atmosphere and humans are responsible for
a fraction of this, but more importantly, and a fact which always seems to be missing, CO2 is not a pollutant, indeed
it is essential to all life on this planet.
Thousands of studies and thousands of scientists are contributing huge amounts of research and data into this conversation, however the UN body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) continually omit this information from their reports, or just censor the scientists; including crucial information like:
No study has ever positively attributed all; or part of climate change, to date; to man made causes! An omission, which was described as: the most disturbing corruption of the peer reviewed process ever witnessed.
And there is plenty more reports of this happening; versions of reports being released that were not the reports approved by the contributing scientists. There are also many scientists who have resigned from the IPCC in protest over this dishonest activity, many have requested their names be removed from the reports, and there have even been scientists having to threaten legal action to force the IPCC to remove their names.
There is an abundance of scientific data which accurately documents increases and decreases in global temperatures, regardless of CO2 levels, regardless of human activity, and even regardless of any human presence at all.
​
One of the major drops in global temperatures in the 20th century was during the economic boom after the second world war, where the increase in industrial activity, related to the production of goods and cars and the associated fossil fuel emissions sent CO2 levels soaring, yet this activity went hand in hand with 35 years of declining global temperatures, defying the logic of the entire CO2 argument.
There is also an abundance of scientific data, which documents hundreds of years of sunspot activity and accurately correlates the increases and decreases in solar activity with increases and decreases in temperatures on earth.
There are ice core studies which go back hundreds of thousands of years which show hundreds of years of lag between rising global temperatures and rising CO2 levels.
There is even a collaborative study between an astrophysicist and a geologist which goes back 600 million years and presents the same correlation between solar activity and global temperatures.
Scientific conclusions aren’t achieved by vote or opinion, and certainly not by emotion, they are about facts.
And the facts are very clear; increases in CO2 are not causing increases in global warming, in fact it is exactly the opposite, it is increases in global warming that cause increases in CO2, and the increase in global temperatures are being controlled by the activity of the sun, not CO2 and certainly not Human CO2.
​
This again is about control. In order to control activity and have a mandate to monitor what everyone is doing, there must be a very powerful reason, otherwise people will just refuse to comply and this is why the 'Climate Change' war cry is, very purposefully; so emotionally charged! In reality it is, as a statement in its own right, ludicrously vague, it offers nothing specific and yet seems to contain everything, with Human generated CO2 sitting right at the top.
​
The corporate mechanism to control Human CO2 emissions is the global drive for 'Net Zero' so expect to see the courageous CEO’s of transnational conglomerates, publicly foregoing, their morning cappuccinos to save the 0.14Kg of CO2 while simultaneously saving the planet.
And as corporations have moved the goalposts to preserve profits and minimise the disruptive effect of having to pay too much tax, these Net-Zero hero’s will do exactly the same with their carbon footprints, while displacing and impoverishing the indigenous peoples of the global south with UN approved carbon offsets.
However, getting to Net-Zero; for ordinary working people, will be an entirely different story.
